Another study is called, Magnetic lung measurements in relation to occupational exposure in asbestos miners and millers of Quebec - Environmental Research Volume 26, Issue 2, December 1981, Pages 535-550 by David Cohen, Thomas S. Crowther1Graham W. Gibbs2 and Margaret R. Becklake. Here is an excerpt: Abstract - Fe3O4 particles (ferrimagnetic) are usually attached to asbestos fibers (nonferrimagnetic) in the chrysotile asbestos mining and milling industries; therefore, a magnetic measurement of Fe3O4 in the lungs of workers in these industries could help determine the amount of asbestos which has been inhaled and retained in their lungs. As a first assessment of this method, magnetic measurements were made of Fe3O4 in the lungs of 115 miners and millers in Quebec. These measurements at an industrial site were found to be feasible and practical; however, the amount of Fe3O4 seen in the lungs of those with welding exposure was large enough to mask the Fe3O4 contributed by asbestos, and this subgroup was considered separately. For the remainder (nonwelders), the amount of Fe3O4 was plotted against a total dust exposure index (asbestos and other dust) estimated for each worker. Although the correlation between these quantities was not high, it was statistically significant at the 1% level. Because retained asbestos is likely to increase with increasing exposure to total dust, this correlation suggests that a magnetic lung measurement of a chrysotile miner or a miller does reflect, to some extent, the amount of asbestos in his lung. There was considerable scatter in the data, partly due to individual variations in deposition and clearance, to which this method is sensitive. When the data of only the nonsmokers were plotted, the amount of Fe3O4 was greater than for the total group of nonwelders. This is consistent with previous findings that less dust is deeply deposited in the lungs of smokers, due to constriction of small airways.
Another study is called, The histopathology and ultrastructure of pleural mesotheliomas produced in the rat by injections of crocidolite asbestos. By Davis JM. - Br J Exp Pathol. 1979 Dec;60(6):642-52. Here is an excerpt: Abstract - Primary tumours of the pleural cavity were produced in rats by the intrapleural injection of crocidolite asbestos. Their histological structure as seen with both light and electron microscopy was very variable and tumours frequently contained elements of both connective-tissue and epithelial type. In some instances the connective-tissue elements predominated from the start and the earliest tumour nodules consisted mainly of pleomorphic connective-tissue cells with only a few layers of cells more nearly epithelial in type on the surface. This pattern was largely retained when tumour nodules increased in size and coalesced, but in the deeper layers of advanced tumours the pleomorphic connective-tissue pattern was often replaced by a more uniform spindle-cell form. Other tumours were more predominantly epithelial in type, showing either a papillary pattern with rounded epithelial cells growing in solid columns, or a vesicular form in which large tissue spaces, often intracellular, were lined by very thin layers of extended cell cytoplasm. Whereas early tumours showed only one histological pattern, the more advanced stages often exhibited areas of all 3, so that there seemed to be some degree of histological mutability. The spindle-cell areas of advanced tumours frequently showed evidence of direct invasion of the surrounding tissue but this was never seen with the epithelial forms of rat mesothelioma.
If you found any of these excerpts interesting, please read the studies in their entirety. We all owe a debt of gratitude to these fine researchers.
You have read the best review article categorized by IRS Tax Attorney
and the title Mesothelioma Diesease And Asbestos Induced Scarring. You can bookmark or spread this post by using this URL https://howto-howto8.blogspot.com/2012/12/mesothelioma-diesease-and-asbestos.html. Thank You!
Comments :
0 comments to “Mesothelioma Diesease And Asbestos Induced Scarring”
Post a Comment